Discussion:
What economists have gotten wrong for decades
(too old to reply)
Checkmate
2019-08-01 04:37:25 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qhtobn$so3$***@dont-email.me>, ***@gmail.invalid
says...
There are some things we must never compromise on. And the rule of law,
presumption of innocence, and similar foundational bedrock of human
rights are some of those things.
We've all seen your version of "presumption of innocence," you hypocritical
KooKtarD.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Snit
2019-08-01 04:54:19 UTC
Permalink
On 7/31/19 8:08 PM, Mattb wrote:
...
Haven't seen you evidence on this $725 number? Give is now........
You are the first I have seen to mention a %$725 number.
But the $775 amount has been backed heavily, and shown to be tied to the
people I mostly talk about... the ones I speak of when I repeatedly use
I'm not running just asking for real evidence not you saying because
you say so which is all I see. I need more than a opinion piece like
how can they spend $725 a child per night.
And you have seen it. And ignored it. OK, you are actively ignorant, not
just passively.

That is on you... and really when your primary point is you are going to
ignore evidence you do not want to see what value do you add to a
conversation?
-----
You and other right wingers are defending felony child abuse tied to
redistribution of money to the for-profit prison corporations because
their parents MIGHT have committed a misdemeanor (though since seeking
asylum is legal that is not even a given). I cannot back the corporate
socialism that you are OK with, and even worse I will NEVER back child
abuse as you do.
-----
You saying so doesn't make it so.
Straw man.
No as you have not given evidence or even a truthful cite.
Do you even know what the term Straw man refers to?
Now backup your claims.
I have given many cites. You pretending they do not exist is of no value
https://www.google.com/search?ei=FkxCXdOcCoSMsQW28aW4AQ&q=%24775+detention+center&oq=%24775+detention+center&gs_l=psy-ab.3...3981.3981..4145...0.0..0.87.87.1......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71.BEyH6CwyYmY&ved=0ahUKEwjT__TrzeDjAhUERqwKHbZ4CRcQ4dUDCAo&uact=5
None of these I looked at showed HOW they can spend $775 per
night. A detailed listing of cost would be interesting.
They cannot spend that much a night and still treat them so poorly. As I
keep saying: it is a part of the redistribution of money to the very rich.

But if you want to see their internal balance sheets I do not have
access to those.
You see the homeless in
CA and Seattle they live under much worse conditions than these
illegal's who can just go back any time.
It is not a competition, and there is no reason to not help both, nor
any reason to abuse either.
Will you help pay for it? Most liberals just want freebies. A work
ethic is beyond your kind Snit.
Pay for it by ending redistribution of money to the rich. End the
plutocracy. Easy. Pay it because it is trivial for the richest country
in the world to do so if we wanted. Absolutely trivial to be moral...
but we choose not to.
Yo still haven't shown how you will do this.
My being moral does not make the country become moral.
You are not moral by what I have seen. Which alias is moral?
Which alias? Do not even follow what you mean. And where have you seen
me being immoral? Be specific.

I can be specific with you: You and other right wingers are defending
felony child abuse tied to redistribution of money to the for-profit
prison corporations because their parents MIGHT have committed a
misdemeanor (though since seeking asylum is legal that is not even a
given). I cannot back the corporate socialism that you are OK with, and
even worse I will NEVER back child abuse as you do.
You claim to have
worked in taxes how will you do this. DETAILS........
STOP REDISTRIBUTING MONEY TO THE RICH.
How is this done?
How do you stop paying the rich? Well, this is a bigger conversation,
but work to get money out of politics and end Citizens United, etc. But
let's stay focused if you can.
You want to shut down wall street?
Hell no.
You want to tax
people savings? Their 401Ks? Details.
I want to stop being a plutocracy.
Boom. Done.
I mean, really, there are devils in the details, but as a basic plan
that would cover this and MUCH more.
And you are not jumping into back it.
Stop paying the wealthy. Really, a simple concept.
But I back "Democratic Socialism", you back "Corporate Socialism".
That isn't true. You have no idea what I support. You have no
idea what I make a year.
Who the hell cares what you made. And if you say you do not back what
you claim to that is on you -- I only have what you say in here. I do
not research your life.
I support a mix of capitalism and Socialism ideas.
Good to see you joining me and most Americans. Cool!
Just don't
support lazy fucks getting a free ride with my labor.
So you want to stop redistributing money to the rich as I do. Good to
see you change your tune and join me. Awesome.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Mattb
2019-08-01 06:13:15 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:54:19 -0700, Snit
Post by Snit
...
Haven't seen you evidence on this $725 number? Give is now........
You are the first I have seen to mention a %$725 number.
But the $775 amount has been backed heavily, and shown to be tied to the
people I mostly talk about... the ones I speak of when I repeatedly use
I'm not running just asking for real evidence not you saying because
you say so which is all I see. I need more than a opinion piece like
how can they spend $725 a child per night.
And you have seen it. And ignored it. OK, you are actively ignorant, not
just passively.
That is on you... and really when your primary point is you are going to
ignore evidence you do not want to see what value do you add to a
conversation?
Sounds like a liberal lie to me. I would need to know how it can cost
that?
Post by Snit
-----
You and other right wingers are defending felony child abuse tied to
redistribution of money to the for-profit prison corporations because
their parents MIGHT have committed a misdemeanor (though since seeking
asylum is legal that is not even a given). I cannot back the corporate
socialism that you are OK with, and even worse I will NEVER back child
abuse as you do.
-----
You saying so doesn't make it so.
Straw man.
No as you have not given evidence or even a truthful cite.
Do you even know what the term Straw man refers to?
Now backup your claims.
I have given many cites. You pretending they do not exist is of no value
https://www.google.com/search?ei=FkxCXdOcCoSMsQW28aW4AQ&q=%24775+detention+center&oq=%24775+detention+center&gs_l=psy-ab.3...3981.3981..4145...0.0..0.87.87.1......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71.BEyH6CwyYmY&ved=0ahUKEwjT__TrzeDjAhUERqwKHbZ4CRcQ4dUDCAo&uact=5
None of these I looked at showed HOW they can spend $775 per
night. A detailed listing of cost would be interesting.
They cannot spend that much a night and still treat them so poorly. As I
keep saying: it is a part of the redistribution of money to the very rich.
Then you can prove this? Details........
Post by Snit
But if you want to see their internal balance sheets I do not have
access to those.
Then you are unable to prove that number is accurate. I thought as
much. Sounds like a AOC type lie.
Post by Snit
You see the homeless in
CA and Seattle they live under much worse conditions than these
illegal's who can just go back any time.
It is not a competition, and there is no reason to not help both, nor
any reason to abuse either.
Will you help pay for it? Most liberals just want freebies. A work
ethic is beyond your kind Snit.
Pay for it by ending redistribution of money to the rich. End the
plutocracy. Easy. Pay it because it is trivial for the richest country
in the world to do so if we wanted. Absolutely trivial to be moral...
but we choose not to.
Yo still haven't shown how you will do this.
My being moral does not make the country become moral.
You are not moral by what I have seen. Which alias is moral?
Which alias?
You have used many in your life.
Post by Snit
Do not even follow what you mean. And where have you seen
me being immoral? Be specific.
When you lie or post numbers you can not provide evidence for.
Post by Snit
I can be specific with you: You and other right wingers are defending
felony child abuse tied to redistribution of money to the for-profit
prison corporations because their parents MIGHT have committed a
misdemeanor (though since seeking asylum is legal that is not even a
given). I cannot back the corporate socialism that you are OK with, and
even worse I will NEVER back child abuse as you do.
Well I wonder if you are a pedophile and run a daycare?
Post by Snit
You claim to have
worked in taxes how will you do this. DETAILS........
STOP REDISTRIBUTING MONEY TO THE RICH.
How is this done?
How do you stop paying the rich? Well, this is a bigger conversation,
but work to get money out of politics and end Citizens United, etc. But
let's stay focused if you can.
The you can not give your proposal just BS. I thought as much.
Post by Snit
You want to shut down wall street?
Hell no.
Then what is your proposal?
Post by Snit
You want to tax
people savings? Their 401Ks? Details.
I want to stop being a plutocracy.
We aren't but look at Venezuela and you will see AOC type socialism
isn't any better. I balance is needed but we do not need freeloading
liberals that use taxes to buy votes.
Post by Snit
Boom. Done.
I mean, really, there are devils in the details, but as a basic plan
that would cover this and MUCH more.
And you are not jumping into back it.
Stop paying the wealthy. Really, a simple concept.
But I back "Democratic Socialism", you back "Corporate Socialism".
That isn't true. You have no idea what I support. You have no
idea what I make a year.
Who the hell cares what you made. And if you say you do not back what
you claim to that is on you -- I only have what you say in here. I do
not research your life.
You lack the means and skills for that.
Post by Snit
I support a mix of capitalism and Socialism ideas.
Good to see you joining me and most Americans. Cool!
Most republicans support that. Just not freebies living off the
State all their lives. Also not to spend taxes on illegal immigrants,
we have citizens in need spend it on them and send the illegals home.
Post by Snit
Just don't
support lazy fucks getting a free ride with my labor.
So you want to stop redistributing money to the rich as I do. Good to
see you change your tune and join me. Awesome.
I want my taxes going to do good and not support freeloaders of any
kind. Yet to date you talk about "redistributing money" and yet do
not define that. Companies make a profit for what is invested do you
believe a owner should make the same as a worker? If I spend say 1.2
million opening a office in a city do I not have the right to get that
back?
kensi
2019-08-01 06:33:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:54:19 -0700, Snit
Post by Snit
But if you want to see their internal balance sheets I do not have
access to those.
Then you are unable to prove that number is accurate. I thought as
much. Sounds like a AOC type lie.
Retract your unfounded smear of AOC. Or else.

And as to the number:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_administration_family_separation_policy#Fiscal_costs_and_diversion_of_resources

"It costs $775 per person per night to house the children"

It's such a well-established fact that it's in Wikipedia. With a
citation footnote link. In short, it's not in dispute, at least by
non-delusional people.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Mattb
2019-08-01 09:09:45 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:33:28 +0200, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Mattb
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:54:19 -0700, Snit
Post by Snit
But if you want to see their internal balance sheets I do not have
access to those.
Then you are unable to prove that number is accurate. I thought as
much. Sounds like a AOC type lie.
Retract your unfounded smear of AOC. Or else.
Right you are not a problem. AOC is worthless.
Post by kensi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_administration_family_separation_policy#Fiscal_costs_and_diversion_of_resources
"It costs $775 per person per night to house the children"
It's such a well-established fact that it's in Wikipedia. With a
citation footnote link. In short, it's not in dispute, at least by
non-delusional people.
Right NBC news? Please where is the data. CNN and NBC are hardly
reliable unless they can give raw data.
Snit
2019-08-01 04:55:00 UTC
Permalink
When Carroll snips dishonestly I use this to bypass his trolling. Others
who troll, such as you, do not like it.
That is an added bonus.
When it says Snit answering Snit makes you look like a idiot.
Your anger is your issue. Best wishes.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Mattb
2019-08-01 06:00:52 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:55:00 -0700, Snit
Post by Snit
When Carroll snips dishonestly I use this to bypass his trolling. Others
who troll, such as you, do not like it.
That is an added bonus.
When it says Snit answering Snit makes you look like a idiot.
Your anger is your issue. Best wishes.
Why would you looking like a idiot make me angry? That you work
around kids bothers me more.
Snit
2019-08-01 04:56:01 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:49:52 -0700, Snit
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:02:54 -0700, Snit
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:05:09 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
You support the camps.
I must say, about the camps, what are we supposed to do?
Same as in 1945, of course: Liberate them.
These people come streaming across the border at the rate of 100,000 per
month, are we supposed to put them up at the Hilton?
It would actually cost less than the concentration camps to do so, so ...
maybe?
In any event, in the long term they should be looking for a job and a
place to stay like any other working-class American. In the short term ...
I don't know. But concentration camps clearly is incorrect, on moral *and*
other grounds.
What did Obama do in his terms as he expelled more than Trump is
and where did Obama keep those that choose to enter the US illegally?
If you want to set them set up in motels have the liberals/democrats
set up a voluntary fund so the only those that want to can donate and
pay for the illegal's.
Fact is we need to fix the system but it is too good a tool for the
Democrats to use during elections.
We spend $775 per kid per night right now... as a part of the US system
of redistributing money to the rich no matter how much it hurts the
poor. And middle class for that matter.
Please cite and give current details on this. True evidence.
First I am surprised you have not heard that the for-profit prison
corporations are getting $775 a night per child... I thought it was
https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/2019/07/04/immigration-detention-centers-turn-suffering-into-profit-shame/1623239001/
-----
For-profit immigration detention centers fail our most basic American values
...
The pictures coming from detention centers are heartbreaking.
? Babies on cold concrete floors, not being allowed to sleep, shower or
wash themselves.
? Children not being able to talk to their parents for weeks at a time.
Teenagers forced to provide whatever comfort they can to their younger
cellmates.
? Parents distraught after having their loved ones ripped from their arms.
...
The cost to maintain a family bed, which keeps mothers and children
together in a family residential center, costs around $319 a day,
according to DHS. But as of April, children have been separated from
their parents with much higher frequency, which has led to the creation
of ?tent cities? to hold thousands of separated children. Those beds
cost $775 per person per night, HHS officials told NBC News.
-----
So it's not $775 per night per kid,
It is for those who have been separated from their parents and are held
in by a for-profit prison corporation.
it's only kids who have been
separated from their parents. Is there a problem you have with stating,
you know, facts (without trying to pad things like you usually do)?
https://www.npr.org/2019/02/13/694138106/inside-the-largest-and-most-controversial-shelter-for-migrant-children-in-the-u-
-----
The average daily cost to care for a child at an influx facility is
about $775 a day, according to Evelyn Stauffer, press secretary at the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. With nearly 1,600 children
at Homestead, that puts the burn rate at over $1.2 million a day.
-----
1600... a far cry from the sales pitch you just gave... but still no
details.
Where did I give a different number?
https://truthout.org/articles/the-problem-with-child-detention-isnt-that-its-private-its-that-it-exists/
-----
Ocasio-Cortez, Omar, Pressley and Tlaib were right to oppose a border
spending bill that would further subsidize Trump?s hostage-taking. If we
are to confront the evils at hand, we must do more than throw money at
the very people who are spending $775 per imprisoned child per day ?
enough to house each child in one of Trump?s luxury hotels ? on housing
for children while depriving them of toothbrushes and adequate meals. No
mechanism of state violence has ever been transformed into a just
institution due to an influx of cash. The arguments of Democrats who
insist that they must feed the system that has ensnared these children,
for their own good, are consistent with their bipartisan complicity with
the overall violence of the immigration detention system.
-----
He asked for details on the *cost*.
-----
We spend $775 per kid per night right now... as a part of the US system
of redistributing money to the rich no matter how much it hurts the
poor. And middle class for that matter.
-----
All you see there is the cost. Oy. Do you ever understand anything you read?
.. as in a breakdown as to *why* the
number is so much higher (than common sense would dictate). Get that and
you'll actually be responsive for a change.
Give details on why it cost $775 and where you got that
number????????
I'm betting you can't.
Snit's gone into Raninman mode.
We've lost him.
Michael is a strange one. He has been lost for years.
You guys hate it when I refuse to follow you off topic and go down every
rabbit hole.

I am happy to see you agree with me finally about not paying for the
rich folks who we redistribute money to.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Mattb
2019-08-01 06:22:37 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:56:01 -0700, Snit
Post by Snit
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:49:52 -0700, Snit
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:02:54 -0700, Snit
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:05:09 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
You support the camps.
I must say, about the camps, what are we supposed to do?
Same as in 1945, of course: Liberate them.
These people come streaming across the border at the rate of 100,000 per
month, are we supposed to put them up at the Hilton?
It would actually cost less than the concentration camps to do so, so ...
maybe?
In any event, in the long term they should be looking for a job and a
place to stay like any other working-class American. In the short term ...
I don't know. But concentration camps clearly is incorrect, on moral *and*
other grounds.
What did Obama do in his terms as he expelled more than Trump is
and where did Obama keep those that choose to enter the US illegally?
If you want to set them set up in motels have the liberals/democrats
set up a voluntary fund so the only those that want to can donate and
pay for the illegal's.
Fact is we need to fix the system but it is too good a tool for the
Democrats to use during elections.
We spend $775 per kid per night right now... as a part of the US system
of redistributing money to the rich no matter how much it hurts the
poor. And middle class for that matter.
Please cite and give current details on this. True evidence.
First I am surprised you have not heard that the for-profit prison
corporations are getting $775 a night per child... I thought it was
https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/2019/07/04/immigration-detention-centers-turn-suffering-into-profit-shame/1623239001/
-----
For-profit immigration detention centers fail our most basic American values
...
The pictures coming from detention centers are heartbreaking.
? Babies on cold concrete floors, not being allowed to sleep, shower or
wash themselves.
? Children not being able to talk to their parents for weeks at a time.
Teenagers forced to provide whatever comfort they can to their younger
cellmates.
? Parents distraught after having their loved ones ripped from their arms.
...
The cost to maintain a family bed, which keeps mothers and children
together in a family residential center, costs around $319 a day,
according to DHS. But as of April, children have been separated from
their parents with much higher frequency, which has led to the creation
of ?tent cities? to hold thousands of separated children. Those beds
cost $775 per person per night, HHS officials told NBC News.
-----
So it's not $775 per night per kid,
It is for those who have been separated from their parents and are held
in by a for-profit prison corporation.
it's only kids who have been
separated from their parents. Is there a problem you have with stating,
you know, facts (without trying to pad things like you usually do)?
https://www.npr.org/2019/02/13/694138106/inside-the-largest-and-most-controversial-shelter-for-migrant-children-in-the-u-
-----
The average daily cost to care for a child at an influx facility is
about $775 a day, according to Evelyn Stauffer, press secretary at the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. With nearly 1,600 children
at Homestead, that puts the burn rate at over $1.2 million a day.
-----
1600... a far cry from the sales pitch you just gave... but still no
details.
Where did I give a different number?
https://truthout.org/articles/the-problem-with-child-detention-isnt-that-its-private-its-that-it-exists/
-----
Ocasio-Cortez, Omar, Pressley and Tlaib were right to oppose a border
spending bill that would further subsidize Trump?s hostage-taking. If we
are to confront the evils at hand, we must do more than throw money at
the very people who are spending $775 per imprisoned child per day ?
enough to house each child in one of Trump?s luxury hotels ? on housing
for children while depriving them of toothbrushes and adequate meals. No
mechanism of state violence has ever been transformed into a just
institution due to an influx of cash. The arguments of Democrats who
insist that they must feed the system that has ensnared these children,
for their own good, are consistent with their bipartisan complicity with
the overall violence of the immigration detention system.
-----
He asked for details on the *cost*.
-----
We spend $775 per kid per night right now... as a part of the US system
of redistributing money to the rich no matter how much it hurts the
poor. And middle class for that matter.
-----
All you see there is the cost. Oy. Do you ever understand anything you read?
.. as in a breakdown as to *why* the
number is so much higher (than common sense would dictate). Get that and
you'll actually be responsive for a change.
Give details on why it cost $775 and where you got that
number????????
I'm betting you can't.
Snit's gone into Raninman mode.
We've lost him.
Michael is a strange one. He has been lost for years.
You guys hate it when I refuse to follow you off topic and go down every
rabbit hole.
I am happy to see you agree with me finally about not paying for the
rich folks who we redistribute money to.
I'd need to see how this figure of $775 was come up with. It is all
in the details. Did that include the cost of the tent, beds, desk
and other items as well as food, medical and schooling? It that every
day? You lack details just post for a agenda.
Snit
2019-08-01 04:57:28 UTC
Permalink
On 7/31/19 7:53 PM, Mattb wrote:
...
--
"When I worked at Intuit they needed a system to compute benefits for the tax
season. Took the "expert programmers," a group of 4 I think, TWO YEARS to
get their system to work.
Took me TWO WEEKS, alone, to have a working system.
Yes, when they completed theirs it was faster and better in many ways. No
doubt. But it took them TWO tax seasons to get it to work. Insane."
I've noticed, also why does he go by 'Snit' does it have meaning?
Southern Nevada Institute of Technology... a joke that goes back to the
1980s.

But that is a side issue to Carroll's admission he cannot imagine
someone getting something done in two weeks. I find that admission by
him to be funny. And quite telling of his incompetence.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Snit
2019-08-01 04:59:17 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:08:37 -0700, Snit
...
Sadly yes but all I can do is refuse to vote for any politician that
would rather help illegals than homeless Americans.
It's a shame it's come to that. I like the melting pot idea but adding
too many too quickly when they won't/can't assimilate is an ever present
issue. Now that it's been weaponized things are f*cked.
If they win the election soon they will need to fix the problem I
would think Obama did much the same as Trump just didn't want a wall.
What court order dealing with immigrants did Obama ignore?
Obama removed more immigrants a year than Trump has and you liberals
said nothing. What is that about other than a election gambit one I
hope you lose.
What court order dealing with immigrants did Obama ignore?

That was the question you just dodged.
SC gave you a lose on the wall it seems. Now while I don't support
a wall I do support the barriers being repaired.
Sure... and $1.3B was allocated for that by the Democrats. First offer.
Not so for the Republicans the year before.
Fact is we need to fix the system but it is too good a tool for the
Democrats to use during elections.
Unfortunately.
Very true or the Dems would at least try to fix the problem. AOC
bitched about funds to buy them kids beds she wants them to be in
those bad conditions for her agenda.
It's sorta looking that way.
I don't understand how her followers can't see it.
In all fairness, there are plenty of things that come out of
Trump's mouth that his supporters don't appear to see. LOL!
That is very true and he really needs to stop tweeting he can do
without being the center of attention for a month and get some good
things done.
The less he gets done the better, given how he wants to harm the country.
You mean you fear for your freebies. I understand your kind it is
all about the freebies that you let other pay for.
This is you lying about my views. It is weird how you keep saying you
agree with me in general and then lie about my views to try to make it
look otherwise. Just bizarre.
Personally, I care about results, the twitter wars are BS.
Yes I agree. Yet I don't like how the social media sites are
censoring anything not of the Far left. Personally I like seeing all
sides and decide for myself not be controlled.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Mattb
2019-08-01 06:17:11 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:59:17 -0700, Snit
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:08:37 -0700, Snit
...
Sadly yes but all I can do is refuse to vote for any politician that
would rather help illegals than homeless Americans.
It's a shame it's come to that. I like the melting pot idea but adding
too many too quickly when they won't/can't assimilate is an ever present
issue. Now that it's been weaponized things are f*cked.
If they win the election soon they will need to fix the problem I
would think Obama did much the same as Trump just didn't want a wall.
What court order dealing with immigrants did Obama ignore?
Obama removed more immigrants a year than Trump has and you liberals
said nothing. What is that about other than a election gambit one I
hope you lose.
What court order dealing with immigrants did Obama ignore?
Which one did Trump ignore?
That was the question you just dodged.
You've dodged most questions so far.
SC gave you a lose on the wall it seems. Now while I don't support
a wall I do support the barriers being repaired.
Sure... and $1.3B was allocated for that by the Democrats. First offer.
Not so for the Republicans the year before.
OK Then they need to get to work.
Fact is we need to fix the system but it is too good a tool for the
Democrats to use during elections.
Unfortunately.
Very true or the Dems would at least try to fix the problem. AOC
bitched about funds to buy them kids beds she wants them to be in
those bad conditions for her agenda.
It's sorta looking that way.
I don't understand how her followers can't see it.
In all fairness, there are plenty of things that come out of
Trump's mouth that his supporters don't appear to see. LOL!
That is very true and he really needs to stop tweeting he can do
without being the center of attention for a month and get some good
things done.
The less he gets done the better, given how he wants to harm the country.
You mean you fear for your freebies. I understand your kind it is
all about the freebies that you let other pay for.
This is you lying about my views. It is weird how you keep saying you
agree with me in general and then lie about my views to try to make it
look otherwise. Just bizarre.
I am a moderate on most issues and it is the degree of extremism I
have a problem with left or right. On this issue I want illegals
expelled and the funds given to help Americans in need.
Personally, I care about results, the twitter wars are BS.
Yes I agree. Yet I don't like how the social media sites are
censoring anything not of the Far left. Personally I like seeing all
sides and decide for myself not be controlled.
kensi
2019-08-01 06:26:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:59:17 -0700, Snit
What court order dealing with immigrants did Obama ignore?
Which one did Trump ignore?<SPANK>
https://www.npr.org/2019/07/30/746746147/aclu-administration-is-still-separating-migrant-families-despite-court-order-to-

Why are you arguing here if you're such a n00b you don't even know how
to google, Mattb?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Mattb
2019-08-01 06:32:18 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:26:46 +0200, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Mattb
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:59:17 -0700, Snit
What court order dealing with immigrants did Obama ignore?
Which one did Trump ignore?<SPANK>
https://www.npr.org/2019/07/30/746746147/aclu-administration-is-still-separating-migrant-families-despite-court-order-to-
Why are you arguing here if you're such a n00b you don't even know how
to google, Mattb?
How can they do this with what they have? Have open borders?
kensi
2019-08-01 06:38:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:26:46 +0200, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Mattb
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:59:17 -0700, Snit
What court order dealing with immigrants did Obama ignore?
Which one did Trump ignore?<SPANK>
https://www.npr.org/2019/07/30/746746147/aclu-administration-is-still-separating-migrant-families-despite-court-order-to-
Why are you arguing here if you're such a n00b you don't even know how
to google, Mattb?
How can they do this with what they have? Have open borders?
What?

Someone call 9-1-1. It looks like Mattb's having a stroke.

(Odd. Usually I have to go a *few* more rounds than this with a k0ok
before they're reduced to gibbering incoherence ... *snicker* ...)
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Mattb
2019-08-01 09:06:22 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:38:15 +0200, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Mattb
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:26:46 +0200, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Mattb
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:59:17 -0700, Snit
What court order dealing with immigrants did Obama ignore?
Which one did Trump ignore?<SPANK>
https://www.npr.org/2019/07/30/746746147/aclu-administration-is-still-separating-migrant-families-despite-court-order-to-
Why are you arguing here if you're such a n00b you don't even know how
to google, Mattb?
How can they do this with what they have? Have open borders?
What?
Someone call 9-1-1. It looks like Mattb's having a stroke.
(Odd. Usually I have to go a *few* more rounds than this with a k0ok
before they're reduced to gibbering incoherence ... *snicker* ...)
This the best you can do. How do you propose they keep the families
together with the facilities they have now?

Simple question.
Snit
2019-08-01 05:00:07 UTC
Permalink
On 7/31/19 7:54 PM, Mattb wrote:
...
I'm all for Congress getting off it's ass and quit going into
re-election mode the day after a election.
Get rid of the Republicans so something can be done to help the actual
people.
You mean get rid of the Republicans so you can steal from people.
No. I mean what I said... though I should have included the corporate
side of the Democrats, too.
They let you near kids that is just wrong.
See: you have insults. You are insecure. I get that. But why not try to
rise above it?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Mattb
2019-08-01 06:20:13 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:00:07 -0700, Snit
Post by Snit
...
I'm all for Congress getting off it's ass and quit going into
re-election mode the day after a election.
Get rid of the Republicans so something can be done to help the actual
people.
You mean get rid of the Republicans so you can steal from people.
No. I mean what I said... though I should have included the corporate
side of the Democrats, too.
The you support pure socialism like AOC. Thought as much.
Post by Snit
They let you near kids that is just wrong.
See: you have insults. You are insecure. I get that. But why not try to
rise above it?
Lets see you insult over and over and bitch when I say a statement you
should not be allowed near a daycare, and never should have been.
Snit
2019-08-01 05:00:22 UTC
Permalink
I'd bet that no one can... this is probably a ploy to get Congress off
its ass.
I'm all for Congress getting off it's ass and quit going into
re-election mode the day after a election.
Get rid of the Republicans so something can be done to help the actual
people.
So only democrats are right? So much for your equal rights.
Dems give more freebies.
To whom... with cites.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Mattb
2019-08-01 06:18:31 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:00:22 -0700, Snit
Post by Snit
I'd bet that no one can... this is probably a ploy to get Congress off
its ass.
I'm all for Congress getting off it's ass and quit going into
re-election mode the day after a election.
Get rid of the Republicans so something can be done to help the actual
people.
So only democrats are right? So much for your equal rights.
Dems give more freebies.
To whom... with cites.
What do you call entitlements without end. I believe in temporary
help not life long freebies. Illegals should get none.
kensi
2019-08-01 05:02:56 UTC
Permalink
That is why the standard in court
is "beyond a reasonable doubt". In casual conversation, though, we use
the term proof more loosely...i
LOL! That's an understatement where *you* are concerned.
There are some cases where guilt is obvious, despite the inability to
prove it, in court or otherwise.
The OJ case was one such case. The Kavanaugh case is not.
Sure it is. The guy's a textbook example of a white, privileged,
upper-class sexual predator right out of this article:

https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Snit
2019-08-01 05:03:11 UTC
Permalink
On 7/31/19 7:58 PM, Mattb wrote:
...
To give you an idea of how far gone Snit is (think of the details you've
--
"When I worked at Intuit
How the hell is Intuit relevant here?
You don't need to worry your pointy head about ;)
I guarantee the poster got my point.
Yes, this Snit has problems and one thing is he never gives evidence
for his claims..
Direct lie on your part. But keep in mind this side issue Carroll
brought up is because he cannot imagine someone getting work done well.
Where is the evidence to support your claim of $725?
Been shown to you repeatedly.
It is truly beyond his thinking to believe it can be done at all.
Meanwhile I am a good problem solver... and he is jealous of that.
Just you saying it isn't good enough.
Absolutely correct... but notice Carroll pointed to an example where I
did a good enough job he could not believe it was possible.

Now that is about my personal life, one cannot prove that. But look at
things like Owl's challenge to download all recipes from a site as PDFs.
I had a solution so good Owl and Peter insisted it was not possible, and
I had my solution faster than Owl had his... and he is a programmer.

Oh, and even in the end my solution offered many benefits over his --
for example my PDFs allowed me to select words to look up, to easily add
annotations, etc. I can show you the video if you care.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
kensi
2019-08-01 05:06:05 UTC
Permalink
If you want to set them set up in motels have the liberals/democrats
set up a voluntary fund so the only those that want to can donate and
pay for the illegal's.
As opposed to now, when the taxpayer pays GEO Group *more* per head to
house them in much worse conditions?

SPNAK!
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Snit
2019-08-01 05:21:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
If you want to set them set up in motels have the liberals/democrats
set up a voluntary fund so the only those that want to can donate and
pay for the illegal's.
As opposed to now, when the taxpayer pays GEO Group *more* per head to
house them in much worse conditions?
SPNAK!
Can we set up a voluntary fund to subsidize the meals to of the wealthy? To
subsidize the cost of labor? You want a corporation to be able to pay less
than a living wage — fine, you cover their costs and do not ask me to. You
want Amazon to not have to pay taxes, fine — you pay their share.

But conservatives only ask how to pay to do moral things.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
kensi
2019-08-01 05:07:40 UTC
Permalink
Very true or the Dems would at least try to fix the problem. AOC
bitched about funds to buy them kids beds she wants them to be in
those bad conditions for her agenda.
You take that back, what you just insinuated about AOC.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Snit
2019-08-01 05:21:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Very true or the Dems would at least try to fix the problem. AOC
bitched about funds to buy them kids beds she wants them to be in
those bad conditions for her agenda.
You take that back, what you just insinuated about AOC.
I would love to know where he gets his lies from.

And then when shown that the kids cost $775 per night per kid he just
insists he never saw it. So weird.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
kensi
2019-08-01 05:10:05 UTC
Permalink
they won't/can't assimilate
Proof, ko0k?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Snit
2019-08-01 05:21:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
they won't/can't assimilate
Proof, ko0k?
It is his racist crap again.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
kensi
2019-08-01 05:12:53 UTC
Permalink
I'd rather my funds go to help the homeless American
citizens in the USA and to help rebuild our infrastructure
Then vote Sanders in the primary and in the general.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Snit
2019-08-01 05:21:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
I'd rather my funds go to help the homeless American
citizens in the USA and to help rebuild our infrastructure
Then vote Sanders in the primary and in the general.
Absolutely!
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
kensi
2019-08-01 05:29:41 UTC
Permalink
<...>
As I've said before, Snit *HATES* rights-- especially equal rights.
He'd like nothing better than to see anyone labeled as a
"conservative" marched off to a "camp" and experimented on.
I'd like to experiment on Snit's head with a
ten-pound sledge hammer. LOL.
K0okThr3At!!11!
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Snit
2019-08-01 05:38:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
<...>
As I've said before, Snit *HATES* rights-- especially equal rights.
He'd like nothing better than to see anyone labeled as a
"conservative" marched off to a "camp" and experimented on.
I'd like to experiment on Snit's head with a
ten-pound sledge hammer. LOL.
K0okThr3At!!11!
Most likely Carroll again. Maybe a copycat.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
kensi
2019-08-01 05:33:15 UTC
Permalink
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Outer filthers are scum.
*ducks into small interior room in basement and waits for
planetary-surface-sterilizing blast wave to pass*
Well, there goes every single irony meter ever manufactured,
simultaneously. And here I'd thought it would be a nuclear war that did it!
I have never outer filthed anyone.
You've been complicit in efforts to do so, koOk, every time you've
perpetuated any of the "Derbyshire" mythology or accused anyone of being
one of his socks. That you've missed the mark in every such case does
not absolve you of having harbored the intent to outer filth.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
kensi
2019-08-01 05:39:31 UTC
Permalink
And here you push insults to try to feel better about yourself.
It's a fact that your opinion holds *no* weight. You can barely read, who
in God's name would trust your opinion on anything
I would trust his over yours, ko0ky.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Snit
2019-08-01 05:49:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
And here you push insults to try to feel better about yourself.
It's a fact that your opinion holds *no* weight. You can barely read, who
in God's name would trust your opinion on anything
I would trust his over yours, ko0ky.
I have been belittled by an open racist. How horrid.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
kensi
2019-08-01 05:42:58 UTC
Permalink
We may not like the idea that the cop feels he has to do that...
but what does that have to do with the price of tea in India? Contrary
to Snit's delusion, that cop is not gonna go down that street wearing a
blindfold.
This is you speaking for me. You cannot refute my comments.
Everybody hates you. Leave.
If that's all you've got, then you've lost the argument, k0Ok.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Snit
2019-08-01 05:49:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
We may not like the idea that the cop feels he has to do that...
but what does that have to do with the price of tea in India? Contrary
to Snit's delusion, that cop is not gonna go down that street wearing a
blindfold.
This is you speaking for me. You cannot refute my comments.
Everybody hates you. Leave.
If that's all you've got, then you've lost the argument, k0Ok.
And he feels the need to use a sock to post it.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
kensi
2019-08-01 05:45:03 UTC
Permalink
Everybody hates you. Leave.
Poor Carroll... just publicly crying now.
Did you happen to look at the guy's header, genius?
Do you really think you can salvage your transparent sockpuppetry just
by protestations and denial?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Snit
2019-08-01 05:49:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Everybody hates you. Leave.
Poor Carroll... just publicly crying now.
Did you happen to look at the guy's header, genius?
Do you really think you can salvage your transparent sockpuppetry just
by protestations and denial?
If he had not been doing this for over a decade with the same schtick in
multiple groups he might be able to fool some people. Same idiotic crap
from him for over a decade.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
Steve Carroll
2019-08-01 14:24:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Everybody hates you. Leave.
Poor Carroll... just publicly crying now.
Did you happen to look at the guy's header, genius?
Do you really think you can salvage your transparent sockpuppetry just
by protestations and denial?
Do you really think endlessly repeating BS makes it true?

kensi
2019-08-01 05:48:02 UTC
Permalink
So judging people based on race is not, to you, racism.
It depends on *how* you're judging them. If you say, 'Damn, those black
people can cook their asses off, these ribs are great!', that's not racism.
Sure it is:

https://wwnorton.com/college/psych/socialpsych/reviews/ch11.asp

"Benevolent racism and sexism consist of attitudes the individual thinks
of as favorable toward a group but that have the effect of supporting
traditional, subservient roles for members of oppressed groups."

Note: though what you just did is called "benevolent" racism, that does
not mean it is *good*. All racism is bad.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Snit
2019-08-01 05:51:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
So judging people based on race is not, to you, racism.
It depends on *how* you're judging them. If you say, 'Damn, those black
people can cook their asses off, these ribs are great!', that's not racism.
https://wwnorton.com/college/psych/socialpsych/reviews/ch11.asp
"Benevolent racism and sexism consist of attitudes the individual thinks
of as favorable toward a group but that have the effect of supporting
traditional, subservient roles for members of oppressed groups."
Note: though what you just did is called "benevolent" racism, that does
not mean it is *good*. All racism is bad.
Yup. Well stated — better than my response.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
Steve Carroll
2019-08-01 14:22:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
So judging people based on race is not, to you, racism.
It depends on *how* you're judging them. If you say, 'Damn, those black
people can cook their asses off, these ribs are great!', that's not racism.
https://wwnorton.com/college/psych/socialpsych/reviews/ch11.asp
"Benevolent racism and sexism consist of attitudes the individual thinks
of as favorable toward a group but that have the effect of supporting
traditional, subservient roles for members of oppressed groups."
While I understand the point being made in that paragraph regarding
"modern racism", throwing adjectives in front of a word, seeking to
change its meaning, is problematic.
Post by kensi
Note: though what you just did is called "benevolent" racism, that does
not mean it is *good*. All racism is bad.
Because of what the word itself means. You're arguing that stereotyping
is the same thing as racism. I'm not buying that argument in the context
of a cop increasing his chances of staying alive in a bad area by paying
attention to conditions on the ground. I'm not gonna try to brainwash
his thoughts so that he doesn't look at what has already been shown to
be a known threat via the stats. If you want a society where no one is
willing to put on a police uniform, this is the recipe. Note, I'm not
saying to approach people based solely on skin color, I am saying that
to *not* be 'suspicious' of a set of conditions where it makes sense to
is nonsense (and you're never gonna stop anyone with working brain cells
from doing it anyway, including black cops).
kensi
2019-08-01 06:08:43 UTC
Permalink
I agree with kensi here. Liberate the camps.
The people in the "Camps" are free
Don't be ridiculous.
When was the last time you actually answered a post without<FOOM!>
When was the last time *you* actually answered a post without
deflections and sudden topic swerves?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
kensi
2019-08-01 06:10:41 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 06:07:03 +0200, kensi
If you're not a right-winger, k0ooOo0ky, then why are you such a
Kavanaugh fanboi that you want him to get away with at least three
counts of rape?
You mean the imaginary accusations by whores desperate for publicity?
No, kooktard, she means the three rapes Kavanaugh was involved in according
to multiple eyewitnesses. Do at least *try* to keep up, mmkay?
For a minute there, I was afraid you were going to say something outrageously
stupid again... and then you did.
No, k0okt4rd, she's correct. I *did* mean the three rapes Kavanaugh was
involved in.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Nadegda
2019-08-01 06:55:03 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 06:07:03 +0200, kensi
If you're not a right-winger, k0ooOo0ky, then why are you such a
Kavanaugh fanboi that you want him to get away with at least three
counts of rape?
You mean the imaginary accusations by whores desperate for publicity?
No, kooktard, she means the three rapes Kavanaugh was involved in according
to multiple eyewitnesses. Do at least *try* to keep up, mmkay?
For a minute there, I was afraid you were going to say something outrageously
stupid again... and then you did.
No, k0okt4rd, she's correct. I *did* mean the three rapes Kavanaugh was
involved in.
SPANKY-SPANKY!

<snicker>
--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Checkmate
2019-08-01 09:30:13 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qhu2c6$so3$***@dont-email.me>, ***@gmail.invalid
says...
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 06:07:03 +0200, kensi
If you're not a right-winger, k0ooOo0ky, then why are you such a
Kavanaugh fanboi that you want him to get away with at least three
counts of rape?
You mean the imaginary accusations by whores desperate for publicity?
No, kooktard, she means the three rapes Kavanaugh was involved in according
to multiple eyewitnesses. Do at least *try* to keep up, mmkay?
For a minute there, I was afraid you were going to say something outrageously
stupid again... and then you did.
No, k0okt4rd, she's correct. I *did* mean the three rapes Kavanaugh was
involved in.
SPANKY-SPANKY!
<snicker>
Imaginary bullshit and politically-motivated baseless accusations don't count,
KooKy Kukumber-Felcher.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
kensi
2019-08-01 06:12:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
In which case, still wrong. You cannot tell just by looking at someone
whether or not they have a valid asylum claim, or a valid visa, or legal
residency, or even American citizenship.
No trial needed.
Of course a trial is needed, to ensure the person you're contemplating
deporting doesn't fall into one of the above categories.
No trial needed.
That's it? You're just going to repeat the exact argument that Nadegda
just refuted?

You don't really understand how this works, do you?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
kensi
2019-08-01 06:21:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/07/26/biden-harris-buttigieg-and-booker-emerge-clear-favorites-wall-street-bankers-open
(Their friends are our enemies.)
Who is "OUR"... KooK?
Non-plutocrat taxpaying Americans, I expect, though Nadegda will likely
be along within a day or so to clarify.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Just Wondering
2019-08-01 06:53:06 UTC
Permalink
I'm all for Congress getting off it's ass and quit going into
re-election mode the day after a election.
Get rid of the Republicans so something can be done to help
the actual people.
We see how that works where it's been tried, in Detroit and Chicago.
So only democrats are right? So much for your equal rights.
Dems give more freebies.
Then they're not whores, just sluts?
Nadegda
2019-08-01 06:54:33 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:42:30 -0400, Herr Gerrrrrgz Hell, Stinky Fleabitten
Implicitly, yes... and as I was saying, it's all about being charged
with a crime and going to trial... the salient point here as
differentiated between an undocumented person who may get no trial.
The Constitution *also* forbids the government to just skip having a trial
and go straight to declaring a person guilty. Article I, section 9,
paragraph 3.
Hypocrite bitch! You declared Justice Kavanaugh guilty of
rape without a trial
Yes, but then, I'm not the government.
<snicker>
Then perhaps you should STFU<SMACKAKOOK!>
You first, kook.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller
Eh? No original text *again*?

<smh>

Hint: it doesn't count as getting the last word if you don't type in any,
you know, new *words*.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Checkmate
2019-08-01 09:01:42 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qhu2b9$so3$***@dont-email.me>, ***@gmail.invalid
says...
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:42:30 -0400, Herr Gerrrrrgz Hell, Stinky Fleabitten
Implicitly, yes... and as I was saying, it's all about being charged
with a crime and going to trial... the salient point here as
differentiated between an undocumented person who may get no trial.
The Constitution *also* forbids the government to just skip having a trial
and go straight to declaring a person guilty. Article I, section 9,
paragraph 3.
Hypocrite bitch! You declared Justice Kavanaugh guilty of
rape without a trial
Yes, but then, I'm not the government.
<snicker>
Then perhaps you should STFU<SMACKAKOOK!>
You first, kook.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller
Eh? No original text *again*?
<smh>
Hint: it doesn't count as getting the last word if you don't type in any,
you know, new *words*.
Look closer, Snippy. I gave you a taste of your own cowardly snip-and-smack
medicine. The fact that you couldn't parse the last line is not my problem.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Nadegda
2019-08-01 06:56:43 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:06:44 -0700, Snit
Pay for it by ending redistribution of money to the rich. End the
plutocracy. Easy. Pay it because it is trivial for the richest country
in the world to do so if we wanted. Absolutely trivial to be moral...
but we choose not to.
Yo still haven't shown how you will do this.
#include <sanders_2020_platform.h>
#include <green_new_deal.h>

There's a start, at the very least ...
--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Just Wondering
2019-08-01 08:27:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Pay for it by ending redistribution of money to the rich. End the
plutocracy. Easy. Pay it because it is trivial for the richest country
in the world to do so if we wanted. Absolutely trivial to be moral...
but we choose not to.
Yo still haven't shown how you will do this.
#include <sanders_2020_platform.h>
#include <green_new_deal.h>
There's a start, at the very least ...
What will you do when you run out of other people's money?
Print a bunch more?
kensi
2019-08-01 08:43:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Nadegda
Pay for it by ending redistribution of money to the rich. End the
plutocracy. Easy. Pay it because it is trivial for the richest country
in the world to do so if we wanted. Absolutely trivial to be moral...
but we choose not to.
   Yo still haven't shown how you will do this.
#include <sanders_2020_platform.h>
#include <green_new_deal.h>
There's a start, at the very least ...
What will you do when you run out of other people's money?
Print a bunch more?
Why do you think the money would run out? It's the *current* system
where the money is running out. The rich have nearly all of it and
they're just sitting on it.

Jobs, housing, and welfare programs combined with higher taxes on the
rich would have the effect of returning some of the money the rich are
sitting on to the bottom tiers of the economy, to be spent on goods and
services and, eventually, to trickle back up to the rich in the form of
corporate profits ... and then be taxed, redistributed, and go through
the whole process again.

Think of the water cycle. What would happen without evaporation? All the
water on the land would flow to the sea and sit there, leaving the
continents all deserts with all of the water in the oceans. That's our
current system. Add in evaporation and the land becomes lush and
fertile, and the oceans not really all that much shallower. The rich
won't be much less rich, but everyone else will be *much* better off and
the economy will be booming again.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
mixed nuts
2019-08-01 09:32:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Nadegda
Pay for it by ending redistribution of money to the rich. End the
plutocracy. Easy. Pay it because it is trivial for the richest country
in the world to do so if we wanted. Absolutely trivial to be moral...
but we choose not to.
Yo still haven't shown how you will do this.
#include <sanders_2020_platform.h>
#include <green_new_deal.h>
There's a start, at the very least ...
What will you do when you run out of other people's money?
Print a bunch more?
Get it from the Russian oligarchs - same as Trump do.
--
Grizzly H.
Nadegda
2019-08-01 06:58:13 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
I'm not a 'right winger'
Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehe.........
Why do you defend Trump and his Nazi stooges at every turn, then, kooky?
Pointing out what they can do is not defending them.
You've done more than that, disingenuous k0Ok; you've argued that the
awful things they are doing near the border are somehow "necessary" for
America's "security", though nothing could be further from the truth.
He wants to toss out equal rights so he does not have to see as many
people who are of the race(s) he wants to be profiled.
And while doing so you've also evinced racial animus toward Latinx
people and Hispanics.
Absolutely correct.
*That* constitutes defending them. And it makes you a goosestepping
jackbooted fascist Nazi thug.
At least echos of that.
SPNAK!
some of the things you're in here complaining about the loudest (that
you're pissed at Trump about) are 'Dem approved'
Center-right corporate DINO approved, perhaps. Which is why we need to
primary nearly every single one of those motherfuckers and replace them
so that in 2020 there are 538 Ocasio-Cortezes running for the House of
Representatives on the Dem ticket, 100 Ilhan Omars running for the
Senate, and a Rashida Tlaib and an Ayanna Presley on the Pres/Veep
ticket (though those last two's actual names would likely be "Warren"
and "Sanders").
I would be happy to see any two of Warren, Sanders, and Buttigieg in any
order. Have not watched tonight's debate yet -- I do know Sanders did a
poor job in the first, hopefully he did better tonight.
Buttigieg?!
https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2019/04/pete-buttigieg-is-not-a-progressive.html
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/07/26/biden-harris-buttigieg-and-booker-emerge-clear-favorites-wall-street-bankers-open
(Their friends are our enemies.)
Who is "OUR"... KooK?
We, the people. Everyone who *isn't* a fatcat billionaire. Obviously.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Klaus Schadenfreude
2019-08-01 09:39:01 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 03:40:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
If you're not a right-winger, k0ooOo0ky, then why are you such a
Kavanaugh fanboi that you want him to get away with at least three
counts of rape?
You mean the imaginary accusations by whores desperate for publicity?
No, kooktard, she means the three rapes Kavanaugh was involved in according
to multiple eyewitnesses.
Oh, you mean the imagined "rapes" by the "eyewitnesses" who only
"remembered" seeing the "rapes" thirty years later.

LOL
Klaus Schadenfreude
2019-08-01 09:41:11 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 03:43:17 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
General public opinion is with Snit, not you kooks: Kavanaugh is guilty.
Here is some "General Public opinion"

Survey finds Hillary Clinton has ‘more than 99% chance’ of winning
election over Donald Trump
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sam-wang-princeton-election-consortium-poll-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-victory-a7399671.html

"POINT PROVEN!"
Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP
Klaus Schadenfreude
2019-08-01 09:41:52 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 03:47:00 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Then you agree with myself, kensi, and Snit, and disagree with Kooky
Karroll, that accused undocumented immigrants should not be detained or
deported without a trial?
If they're HERE, they've obviously committed a crime. No trial needed.
Put them on a bus and send them back.
So simple even a leftist could figure it out.
Wrong. Or else the entire country ought to be locked up.
OK, so a leftist CAN'T figure it out.
Loading...